Whenever a successful woman experiences
some kind of career freak-out, the great Having It All debate is
re-ignited. Sometimes it is a politician who decides to spend more time
with her family who sets the whole thing rolling, sometimes a TV
presenter who goes into emotional meltdown.
On this occasion, the respected Daily
Mail columnist Allison Pearson has confessed that over the past 18
months she has been waking at 4am with sad, self-destructive thoughts.
"Sometimes I think it would be easier not to be," she has told her
therapist and her readers. "Not to be dead. I have two children, I can't
leave them. But just to stop, you know. To not exist for a while."
So she would be stopping her Daily Mail
column. Fortunately ? although this fact was strangely not mentioned in
the article ? she has been recruited by a rival newspaper as a columnist
and feature writer.
In the meantime, as is traditional in
Having It All stories, the personal is made general. Pearson believes
she is not alone. She had been "enrolled in the growing army of
depressed middle-aged women. Let's call us The Blues Sisters. Unofficial
logo: Edvard Munch's The Scream." The assumption here, so widespread
that it has become a widely-accepted mental clich? is that there is
something uniquely troubled and tragic about working women with
families.
By a stroke of unlucky timing, those with
real knowledge of stress-related mental health problems have recently
suggested that this view is, to put it politely, flawed. In spite of the
statistics, "in reality men are just as likely to experience depression,
but are far less likely to seek help, be diagnosed and seek treatment,"
according to Paul Farmer, the chief executive of the mental health
charity Mind.
Social pressure on men to show strength
at all times is one factor. When they do, the diagnostic criteria used
to assess levels of depression are geared towards women. Three-quarters
of all suicides are male. The figures, in other words, are allowing a
myth of female vulnerability to pass itself off as fact. The view from
Mind has been independently supported by the Men's Health Forum and by a
spokesman for the Royal College of General Practitioners.
Depression is a devastatingly grim
experience, and anyone who suffers from it deserves the greatest
sympathy and help. It is not, though, something from which the Blues
Sisters suffer in particular. Men simply talk ? and write ? about it
rather less.
Can the
McCanns be thinking straight?
Three years
have passed since the disappearance of
Madeleine McCann
and her parents are
determined that the search for her should not slip out of the world's
headlines. To keep the story alive, they have just released a moody
video, complete with a musical soundtrack, which includes a photograph
of the three-year-old wearing make-up and gazing into the camera. It is
that image which, predictably, has featured in the media,
It seems a bizarre and unsettling
development. Clearly,
Kate and
Gerry McCann
have been living through a nightmare of unimaginable horror and perhaps,
even after three years, they are not thinking straight. If so, someone
should surely have pointed out to them that, in a case over which
paedophilia casts an obvious shadow, it looks downright weird when a
photograph which has the effect of sexualising the missing child becomes
part of the campaign to find her.
Obviously, the make-up game and the
photograph were innocent at the time but, when the private picture is
released into the public domain in these circumstances, something
altogether nastier kicks in.
What was the point of this exercise,
apart from getting more news coverage? At a time when there is justified
concern over Primark selling Little Miss Naughty padded bras for
eight-year-olds and allegations that Playboy brands are being aimed at
the primary school market, the circulation of this can only feed
prurience of the very worst kind.
Maybe it was a misjudgement, but it
confirms a niggling sense that the McCanns' publicity? at-all-costs
campaign has seriously lost its way.
Your country
needs you ? to lose weight
If Britain is, as we've been told,
sitting on an obesity time problem, then America's fat problem is
acquiring nuclear status. An estimated one in three young Americans are
now said to be obese.
When our own Jamie Oliver tried to point
out that for American schools to give children deep-fried pizza for
breakfast was not a good idea, there was great affront. One enraged
shock-jock caused our boy to blub with frustration on camera.
Now the American fat bomb has taken on a
security aspect. Two former chairmen of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff,
John Shalikashvili and Hugh Shelton, have issued a stark public warning.
More than a quarter of Americans are now too fat to fight, they say.
Such is the threat to the future defence of the nation that, with no
less than 130 retired generals, admirals and military leaders, they are
calling on Congress to pass child nutrition legislation. In 1946, a law
was passed to improve the quality of school food because, it was
thought, raising puny weaklings threatens national security. Now the
pendulum has swung the other way.
There was a time, a few decades back,
when this solemn announcement from the ranks of lantern-jawed crew-cuts
would have had draft-dodgers and peaceniks putting on the pounds as an
act of protest and waddling down the streets in TOO FAT TO FIGHT
t-shirts. In these less subversive, more patriotic days, the call to
diet on behalf of your country might just possibly work. |