A Lisbon Court last night ruled that of
the parents of missing British toddler
Madeleine McCann had suffered as a
result of the publication of a book by
former Portuguese police detective
Gonçalo Amaral in an ongoing libel suit.
But the court added that the book did
not hamper the search for Madeleine nor
did it destroy the family.
Kate and Gerry McCann instituted legal
proceedings in 2010, seeking damages of
one million pounds against Amaral who
oversaw the first six months of the
investigation into the disappearance of
Madeleine McCann.
During Thursday’s ruling, which the
McCanns did not attend, Judge Emília
Melo e Castro revealed that emotional
damage had been caused by Amaral’s book,
The Truth of the Lie.
A source close to case had originally
been quoted by Lusa News Agency as
stating that " it was proven that damage
was caused as direct result by the
book's publication", who also confirmed
that the judge ruled that the book
"contains information from the actual
case", which could constitute a breach
of Portugal’s strict secrecy laws. But
according to the court ruling, these are
nonetheless facts contained in the
investigation conducted by Portuguese
police in the wake of Madeleine's
disappearance.
The judge also found that "it had not
been proven that Kate and Gerry McCann
were affected from a moral, social and
ethical point of view", but said that
the publication of the book by Amaral
resulted in the couple "feeling anger,
despair, anxious, worried and suffered
sleepless nights and experienced a lack
of apetite."
Newspaper reports have also since stated
the couple's reputation had already been
damaged prior to the book's release,
which might be seen as factor which
could substantially reduce any pay-outs
should the court decide in favour of the
McCanns.
But Miguel Cruz Rodrigues, lawyer for
the former PJ detective, told newspaper
Público that he did not expect "anything
but for his client to be cleared" of the
charges made against him.
The lawyer for the McCann family, Isabel
Duarte, was not immediately available
for comment.
The couple had alleged that the book had
resulted in people giving up in their
search for Madeleine, but the judge was
said to be satisfied with police
testimony that the book did not stop
detectives from obtaining information or
to investigate her disappearance.
According to Público, the court also
reportedly stated that for the "majority
of people" who read the book, they would
find that the McCanns are not held
responsible for the death of their
daughter, but rather "that they had
responsibilities in the concealment of
her body."
The case was closed in September 2008,
resulting in the arguido status on the
McCanns being lifted. The case was
re-opened in the autumn of 2013 by the
Attorney-General's office after new
evidence was presented by PJ
detectives.
A final ruling is expected to take at
least 60 days before being read out.
* The story was updated at 15:30 on
22/01/2015 having been initially based
on an article filed by the Lusa News
Agency |