As the whole issue of freedom of
expression and how far it should go is
still keenly under discussion following
the Paris terror attacks earlier this
month, the €1.2 million defamation case
taken by the parents of Madeleine McCann
against former PJ inspector Gonçalo
Amaral came quietly to its penultimate
stage in court in Lisbon this morning.
If anyone was expecting fireworks, they
were mistaken.
Anne
Guedes, who has been reporting on
the court hearings since the outset,
tweeted shortly after midday: “It was no
hearing and is over. No public reading
but some infos will come”.
It was yet another hitch in the
six-year-long case that has seen the
McCanns claiming Amaral’s book “The
Truth of the Lie” defamed them. They are
reported to be demanding over a €1.2
million in damages. Amaral has always
maintained he was exercising his right
to freedom of expression. One of the
cornerstones of his defence has been
that everything he wrote in his book
suggesting Madeleine was not abducted is
born out in the official police records
of the long-running investigation.
Others present in court this morning
included
Ima
Van den Hoek, who tweeted that
neither the McCanns’ lawyer Isabel
Duarte nor Gonçalo Amaral were in
evidence this morning. Amaral is said to
be ill, reports Ms Van den Hoek.
According to Amaral’s lawyer, the final
session - the verdict - is now not
expected before March.
Today’s non-event had been billed as the
moment judge Emília Mello e Castro would
reveal the proven facts that she will
now pass judgement on. As bloggers who
have followed the case since the outset
have commented, “it has all gone
strangely quiet”. Even “spurious Maddie
stories which normally circulate
whenever this case comes to court” seem
thin on the ground, said one.
This did not stop the Express on Sunday
rehashing a story covered widely in May
this year of a young man in Albufeira
who stabbed a woman while high on drugs
and shouted: “I killed Maddie McCann and
now I am going to kill you” (see:
http://portugalresident.com/update-albufeira-stabbing-takes-bizarre-new-...).
As all media pointed out at the time,
this would have meant that the young man
in question was only 14 when he
supposedly killed Madeleine McCann.
|