"Now for the evidence," said the King,
"and then the sentence."
"No!" said the Queen," first the
sentence, and then the evidence!"
It's amazing what you find down a rabbit
hole these days, especially on the
Nancy Grace
show. The last few weeks have served up
two Madeleine McCann 'specials' complete
with a Mad Hatter's tea party of self
appointed experts, poorly informed
dabblers and people who just like the
sound of their own voice. All fighting
for their slice of the cake.
What is left over, after the unsavoury
feast, is a doggy-bag of misinformation,
lies and misdirection. As an example of
investigative journalism, it ranks
alongside SpongeBob SquarePants'
front-page scoops for the Krabby
Kronicle.
The most important points raised in the
shows which will be highlighted and
corrected over the following weeks but,
to start with, an old chestnut, thought
long ago to have been buried under 6
feet of soil:
Chapter 1. Six dead bodies
Mike Walker (National Enquirer): "And as
the doctor, as the wife pointed out, she
said I handled six dead bodies just days
ago, before I came to Portugal for my
vacation. That's what I do. I'm a
doctor."
Kate McCann was a part-time GP at a
small practice in Melton Mowbray, a
sleepy town in middle England with a
population of 25,500. Leaving aside the
fact that it would not have been her job
to routinely 'handle dead bodies', 6
dead, under her part-time care, in the
days before she left for Portugal, would
surely have raised questions as to her
professional competence. Indeed, such a
scenario, if true, would test the
credibility of an Agatha Chrsitie or
Ruth Rendell
novel.
A quick Google search reveals there were
no reported outbreaks of smallpox,
bubonic plague or arsenic in the pork
pies, so we are left to conclude that
the '6 dead bodies' were unceremoniously
exhumed purely to counter the
indications made by the sniffer dogs.
But why? If there has never been a
'shred of evidence' that Madeleine is
dead, as the McCanns have consistently,
and persistently, argued, then why did
they feel the need to manufacture an
alibi for the smell of death found in
locations, and on various items,
connected to them?
Philomena McCann, Gerry's sister, was
the first to pick up the baton, on the
day of Gerry McCann's arguido interview:
“He’s going in at 2pm today. But he’s
not the main suspect, for some unknown
reason there’s something about a sniffer
dog sniffing Kate. Suddenly a dog can
talk and says she smelled a death. How
can that be when a British sniffer dog
came out months after Madeline’s case.
They’re doctors, if there’s a smell of
death on them could that possibly be a
patient?”
It's worth noting here that the primary
concern of Philomena is to shift the
finger of blame away from her brother
onto his wife. Blood is thicker than
water, after all. It's only once she has
irrevocably established that
'the
main suspect' is Kate, that
she feels comfortable to move onto the
dogs indications - those being
associated with Kate, of course. She
does not reject the dogs alerts as
'ludicrous' and 'impossible' but accepts
them and further seeks to provide
justification for them.
It was Lori Campbell, writing in the
Sunday Mirror, 09 September 2007, who
then developed the story further:
'Kate was also told sniffer dogs had
discovered the scent of a corpse on her
jeans. But she said that could be easily
explained because as a locum GP she had
been near a dead person before the
family's holiday.'
Quite what she was doing
'near'
a dead person, in her jeans, without
seemingly attending to them, remains a
mystery. Maybe she thought she could
assess the state of the unfortunate
person's health by standing in a
different room, much like she claims was
the case when she checked on Madeleine ("I
did my check about 10.00 'clock and went
in through the sliding patio doors and I
just stood, actually [in the living
room] and I thought, oh, all quiet, and
to be honest, I might have been tempted
to turn round then...").
But wait, there's more. In another
report, in the same issue, by the same
author, the number has remarkably grown,
as if Ms Campbell had suddenly
discovered a cake labelled 'EAT ME':
'Friends have pointed out that GP Kate
was present at several deaths before she
went away on holiday.'
The idea that Kate attended to
'several deaths', or even
just the one, dressed in clothes suited
to a Portuguese beach holiday surely
stretches the credibility of that
argument to snapping point. It appears
it wasn't only Eddie, the Enhanced
Victim Recovery Dog, that was barking at
that time.
It is unsurprising that the claim was
quickly dropped after the McCanns fled
back to the UK and fell into the arms of
a team of high profile and expensive
lawyers, and various PR personnel. It
has never been repeated since - until
being dug up again for the Nancy Grace
show.
It seems clear that the McCanns' lawyers
realised the McCanns were sheltering in
a house of cards and advised them to
turn defence into attack. They did so by
embarking on a course of action designed
to undermine and belittle the
capabilities of the sniffer dogs and the
credibility of their handler, Martin
Grime.
Hence we witnessed the following
exchange, in an interview with Sandra
Felgueiras for Portuguese TV, 05
November 2009:
Sandra Felgueiras:
This is the first time that you give us
a big interview, not being arguidos
[suspects], since then. So now I feel
free to ask you this directly: How can
you explain the coincidence of the scent
of cadaver found by British and not
Portuguese dogs?
Kate McCann:
Sandra, maybe you should be asking the
judiciary because they've examined all
this...
Sandra Felgueiras:
But those were not an explanation for
that.
Kate McCann:
I mean, we are obviously Madeleine's mum
and dad and we're desperate for people
to help us find Madeleine, which is why
we're here today. The majority of people
are inherently good and I believe the
majority of people in Portugal are
inherently good people and we're asking
them if they'll help us spread this
message to that person or people that
knows something.
Sandra Felgueiras:
So you don't have any explanation for
that?
Gerry McCann:
Ask the dogs, Sandra.
Sandra Felgueiras:
Ask the dogs? No, Gerry. Now I think,
well, I feel free to ask you. Don't you
feel free to answer me?
Gerry McCann:
I can tell you that we have obviously
looked at evidence about cadaver dogs
and they are incredibly unreliable.
Sandra Felgueiras:
Unreliable?
Gerry McCann:
Cadaver dogs, yes. That's what the
evidence shows, if they are tested
scientifically.
Indeed. So unreliable that they continue
to be used as an investigative tool in
all major homicide inquiries and missing
people cases.
Most recently, Martin Grime testified at
the murder trial of D'Andre Lane, who
was found guilty of abusing and
murdering his two-year-old daughter,
Bianca Jones, even though, like
Madeleine, her body has never been
found.
Mr Grime's cadaver dog 'Morse' detected
a scent inside Lane's car (on the
child's blanket and on a car seat), in
the girl's bedroom and in Lane's home.
"Have the results you've come up with
ever been contradicted?" asked Judge
Vonda Evans at the trial.
"No," replied Mr Grime.
Nigel Moore is based in
Leicester, England, United Kingdom, and
is a Stringer for Allvoices. |