EVER
since Madeleine McCann went missing, the nation has been
united behind efforts to find her.
But
sympathy for her parents Kate and Gerry has crumbled after
Portuguese police formally named them as suspects earlier
this month.
Sun
columnist Jon Gaunt has been one of the McCanns’ most
outspoken critics. On Monday he accused them of manipulating
the media and behaving irresponsibly.
Meanwhile, fellow Sun writer and TV presenter Lorraine Kelly
has been fighting in the opposite corner as one of their
biggest defenders.
Here, the pair go head to head to debate the case.
Watch highlights from the debate
JON GAUNT: Lorraine, you’re a mother, I am a father. You
would never leave your kids home alone, would you?
LORRAINE KELLY: No, I would not. The McCanns made a mistake.
But don’t you think they are saying that to themselves every
minute of every day?
They made the biggest mistake of their lives and now they
are paying for it in the most horrible way.
JG: I
would accept that if it was just a one-off, but it wasn’t.
It was a pattern of behaviour, they were doing it all the
time.
LK: It is
not something I would have done. I would have been too
worried about my child waking up, but no one knows that
better than them.
JG: Hang
on, this was a middle-class couple, one is a cardiologist,
the other a locum GP. Kate McCann is exactly the sort of
woman who would sit in judgement of other people. If it was
a working-class family on a caravan holiday in Blackpool,
the press would be pouring a bucketload over them.
LK: But
they have been criticised. Now what we have to do is get
back to the fact that Maddie is still missing.
JG: But they still haven’t actually
said ?We were wrong’. They left young twins and a
three-year-old girl in a room alone. Sorry, they’re bad
parents.
LK: I
don’t think they are, look what they are going through.
JG: You
just feel sorry for them. I feel sympathy too, and I am sure
a lot of Sun readers do. But you can’t confuse sympathy and
support.
If people really supported them there
would be more than £1.2million in that fund. When I
criticised the McCanns in my column I had the biggest
reaction I have ever had, and 98 per cent of people were
saying I was right. That they are bad parents.
LK: Well,
I have found the majority of feedback in my postbag is
positive. The McCanns have been criticised for using the
media. But if your child was missing, wouldn’t you do
everything you could to get them back? Surely we can’t give
them stick for that?
JG: If
they are innocent.
LK: I
believe they are innocent. No doubt.
JG: But
they are suspects. That puts a question mark over them for
me.
LK: The
term suspect means something different in Portugal and that
has been the trouble all along. And all this secrecy means
information has oozed out as rumours. I don’t believe they
have anything to do with the disappearance.
JG: You
just don’t want to believe it. You are reacting like a
typical mother, you don’t want it to be true.
LK: But
there’s no real evidence, Jon. The McCanns have an
explanation for every single bit of so-called evidence.
JG: I
accept that, and none of us know the truth. But the
Portuguese police aren’t the only ones briefing the press,
the McCanns are too. Kate has got herself in trouble by
talking about what questions she’s been asked.
I nearly
choked on my Alpen on Sunday when I was saw Sky News and the
McCanns let the press follow them walking to Mass. That
wasn’t about Maddie, it was them trying to prove their
innocence.
LK:
Because they have been accused on one of the most heinous
crimes possible and they have to try to clear their names.
JG: The
way to do that is in a court of law, it isn’t to leak
information.
LK:
Something has been worrying me. Four years ago there was
another little girl who disappeared in that area. The police
officer in charge of the Maddie investigation allegedly beat
a confession out of the mother.
So there
has been a little girl missing already, and now there is
another. If we put the focus on the McCanns, we will lose
sight of who really did this. They are still out there.
JG: I
agree, so let’s get the McCanns in court as soon as possible
and find out what is happening and move on.
LK: But
there isn’t enough evidence. As the days go by, the rag, tag
and bobtail evidence is falling apart.
JG: There
are still certain questions Kate has not answered. For
example, why did she wash Cuddle Cat?
LK:
Because it was dirty.
JG: Oh,
come on. My daughter Bethany has a toy called Dotty. If, God
forbid, she went missing, we would never ever wash it
because it would smell of her. Why didn’t they use a baby
sitter? Kate apparently didn’t want to leave the kids with a
stranger, but she was happy to leave them alone with the
door open.
LK: Look,
we all watch CSI and want cases neatly wrapped up. But life
isn’t like that. There could be many reasons for that DNA in
the boot. And as for that nonsense that they drugged their
child. . .
JG: What
about the excuses they are coming out with, that the hair
could come from a hairbrush. I’m not saying they are guilty
or innocent. I’m saying get them in court to find out.
LK: You
would put them through that, two people who have lost their
daughter and have nothing to do with it?
JG: You
don’t know that.
LK:
Everybody keeps having a go at the McCanns for not showing
enough emotion, as if everyone deals with grief in exactly
the same way.
I’m sure
that behind closed doors they are sobbing their hearts out.
JG: I
think there is serious concern about the twins. I think that
social services should intervene. They are suspects, after
all.
LK: In
Portuguese law.
JG: All
the press are being racist implying, ?These Portuguese
coppers don’t know what they are doing’.
LK: I
didn’t mean that, I meant in Portuguese law being a suspect
means a totally different thing to here.
JG: I
think the best thing the McCanns can do now is shut up. They
should say: ?If you want to charge us, go ahead, but we are
going to hold our council.’
LK:
Somewhere out there, there is a person who did something
terrible to that poor girl. And that frightens me. |