As a criminologist, former detective and
authority on paedophile crimes, I have followed
the Madeleine McCann case from the very
beginning.
|
What happened to Madeleine? |
What happened to her on
that fateful night in May 2007? Where is she
now, is she alive or dead? Was she murdered in
her parent's apartment, and if so by whom?
Was she abducted from
where she slept in between her brother and
sister who remained asleep throughout?
Or did she wander out of
the apartment looking for her parents and become
the victim of an opportunistic predatory
paedophile, who either used her for his own
sexual gratification or smuggled her out of the
country?
With apparent sightings in
Morocco, Spain, France and the Netherlands you
could easily believe the latter.
The most sinister of all
these questions was whether Gerry and Kate
McCann were involved with the disappearance of
their own daughter.
In order to establish
answers it is necessary to examine the police
investigation.
The detailed examination
of a scene plays a crucial part in any major
investigation and after a critical incident like
this, all police officers know it is vital to
preserve the crime scene, build the foundations,
complete forensics and identify possible
witnesses immediately.
But I saw no evidence of
this being done and it was without any doubt,
the worst-preserved crime scene I have ever
witnessed.
This investigation is like
no other I have seen before or will hopefully
ever see again.
For the past year the
Portuguese police have had two lines of inquiry:
the first, that Gerry and Kate were involved in
Madeleine's disappearance and the second, that a
stranger abducted her.
However, they have focused
steadfastly on their first line of enquiry.
The public prosecutor's
office in the Algarve believes police should
keep looking for evidence against the McCanns
even though doubt is being raised from other
quarters, with officials in the Portuguese
government asking for their arguido status to be
lifted.
The investigation is all but closed and recent
interviews with the 'Tapas Seven' revealed no
new leads or discrepancies but did allow the
police to establish the exact movements of Gerry
and Kate both on the evening Madeleine
disappeared and on the previous evening.
The next major development
will be if Portuguese police manage to stage a
reconstruction so they can examine the behaviour
of all parties concerned - but this would put
Gerry and Kate back under Portuguese
jurisdiction.
It is quite correct for
the police to consider the parents as suspects
but what evidence do they have against them?
The time line is crucial.
The last time Madeleine was seen by anyone
independently was around 6.30pm with the alarm
raised at 10pm, thus establishing a window of
opportunity of approximately three-and-a-half
hours.
However, both Gerry and
Kate were with their friends in the tapas bar
from approximately 8.30pm, only ever being away
from the table for short periods of time.
So one or more of the
parents did have the opportunity - but what
would be the motive? Could it have been an
accident or a deliberate act?
I don't believe for one
minute it would have been deliberate so
therefore could she have suffered an accident,
causing the parents to panic?
At this point they could
easily have explained away an accident.
But, if the theory is to
be believed, they would have had to
cold-bloodedly dispose of her body and then
return to have dinner with their friends.
It is possible as most
murdered children are killed by a relative or
someone they know. The police are working on
this premise although in this particular case
this is where the theory falls down.
The police believe they
hid Madeleine's body and didn't return to the
location until five weeks later where - under
the watchful glare of the world's media - they
placed her by now decomposed body into the rear
of their Renault Megane hire car before
completely disposing of it.
The police have come to
this conclusion because they have found partial
DNA in the boot of the hire car, which I believe
has either come from transfer when they moved
Madeleine's clothes and belongings or even from
those of her brother or sister.
While trafficking of
children is a far greater problem than is
acknowledged, Madeleine does not fit the
profile.
|
Mark Williams-Thomas |
Girls are trafficked for
two reasons: into the sex trade as prostitutes
or for domestic slavery, both with financial
gain to the seller and purchaser. Who was to
gain from her trafficking?
I believe the so-called
sightings in other countries, although genuinely
intended, are a distraction and prove to be of
little value after the initial two weeks. Who is
going to openly walk out with the most wanted
child in the world?
I believe what happened on
May 3 was that Madeleine woke up, cried for a
short while, realised her parents weren't in the
apartment as they had not come in to settle her,
so she climbed out of bed and walked around the
apartment.
She found the back patio
door was insecure and partly open so she walked
out, went down the small flight of steps and out
of the gate, turning right down towards the
entrance to the resort and the Tapas bar.
It was at this point that
she was most likely abducted by an opportunistic
predatory paedophile.
Interestingly the police
dogs first tracked a scent down this exact
route. Unfortunately, although it is within
range of the supermarket CCTV it was not
working.
I don't believe a
paedophile was watching the apartment nor do I
believe an offender entered the apartment - this
would be too high-risk.
I accept that
statistically the abduction of a child is very
rare, with approximately six children abducted
every year in the UK, but if we look at the
abduction and murder of Sarah Payne we can see
how my theory stands up.
On July 1, 2000, Sarah was
playing a game of hide and seek in a cornfield
with her sister and two brothers, received a
knock on the head and decided to walk back to
her grandparents' home.
She walked through a gap
in the hedge with her brothers' only seconds
behind - but by the time they reached the lane,
Sarah had disappeared.
One of the brothers saw a
white van coming down the road towards him, its
wheels spinning. The driver seemed in a hurry to
get away. Unknown to them, the man behind the
wheel had just abducted Sarah. She was taken in
a matter of seconds.
This is why I believe even
with such a small window of opportunity - the
distance between the back entrance to the
apartment and the 40 yard walk to the Tapas bar
- that Madeleine became the victim of an
opportunist and predatory paedophile who either
lived in or had direct contacts with Praia da
Luz.
This is not a resort that you would just happen
upon. |