|
Translation By Joana Morais
|
|
|
Police searches Portuguese
man
Maddie Case: New Suspect
Former employee was
questioned by PJ years ago |
|
|
Short debate on Operation Grange's “new
suspect”. Rua Segura is a daily TV show
broadcast by CMTV, presented by Sara
Carrilho, where criminal and current
issues are debated and analysed. On this
episode the program had as guests Carlos
Anjos, former PJ inspector and former
head of the Criminal Investigation
Officers' Union and Rui Pereira, former
Minister of Internal Affairs. |
|
Short debate on Operation Grange's
“new suspect”. Rua Segura is a daily
TV show broadcast by CMTV, presented
by Sara Carrilho, where criminal and
current issues are debated and
analysed. On this episode the
program had as guests Carlos Anjos,
former PJ inspector and former head
of the Criminal Investigation
Officers' Union and Rui Pereira,
former Minister of Internal Affairs.
|
|
|
|
Sara Carrilho - Scotland Yard
is searching for a former Ocean Club
worker, the tourist resort in Praia
da Luz from where Madeleine McCann
disappeared in May 2007. The British
authorities wish to question this
man who they believe may provide for
new leads concerning the
disappearance.
News segment (unknown voice over) -
After nine years there's a new
suspect in the Maddie McCann case.
This time, the line of enquiry of
the British authorities pursues a
former employee of the Ocean Club,
the resort in Praia da luz, in the
Algarve, where the English family
were holidaying when Maddie
disappeared in 2007. Scotland Yard
wants to question again the former
worker who may be of Portuguese
nationality and hasn't yet been
located.
However, this man had already been
questioned by the Judiciary Police (PJ)
in 2007, this, because the man in
question took part in a burglary in
the ocean Club at the lunch time, on
the same day that Madeleine
disappeared. Even though this man is
not being investigated as the
abductor he may provide new leads
concerning this case.
The investigation that would have
ended in April will be extended
until September. The Sun tabloid
advanced that for the investigation
of the British authorities to
continue a new fund of 96 thousand
euros was granted. This new lead is
considered to be the last
opportunity in the investigation to
find Maddie McCann, an investigation
of the British authorities that has
been ongoing for the past nine years
(Op. Grange started in 2011), whose
costs have surpassed 14 million
euros.
Sara Carrilho - Carlos Anjos,
this may be the last opportunity to
do something in this investigation
opened by the English authorities.
Yet this man, this former worker the
British police are seeking now had
already been questioned in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Carlos Anjos - What new lead,
opportunity? We are 10 million
citizens, they have plenty of
suspects to find here in Portugal,
this is only just one more. I'm not
even going to say that this is
playing with the investigation, it's
just shocking.
At the time the police identified a
series of people, over two dozen, to
establish why they were there and
this man was one of them.
People that didn't have to be in
there, that weren't from that area,
or didn't live there and this was
done using various techniques, there
was a wide-sweeping search of cell
phones of people that were in that
area, everything was tried, then the
police arrived to those individuals.
This man worked at the Ocean Club,
it is said (referring the news
segment) that it's not known whether
he is Portuguese or not, actually he
is Portuguese, and it is not true
either that he has vanished, he
might not have a fixed address
because he might be without a home,
given the miserable life that he
has. This man committed a crime of
burglary in the morning, close to
noon, at a time the child was in the
beach with the mother, and the
father.
The disappearance takes place in the
night, when the parents were, excuse
my expression, soaking at the table,
emptying bottles of wine. So, they
want to connect a man who burgled a
handful of things from a bedroom, a
theft of opportunity since the
tourists had left the door unlocked,
if not mistaken German tourists,
when they were all in the beach -
any one of us was lucky to not have
been there that day, in the Ocean
Club, otherwise Scotland Yard would
easily, just because we had red
socks or something equally absurd,
constitute us as arguidos and make
us suspects of the death.
This investigation is a tragedy, is
a bottomless bag (endless supply),
and it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy
that we don't know what happened to
Maddie, but above all is the
careless way they say they have a
new suspect. But what new suspect?
The man as already been heard, he
has already explained...
Sara Carrilho - What is
certain is that vast amounts of
money are given to this
investigation.
|
|
|
|
Carlos Anjos - ... Worse than
that, it is already known where he
was at the time of the crime. That
is, even though he committed the
burglary, he was eliminated because
at that time - this is something
that I don't understand, I don't
understand this investigation, it
has nothing to do with a criminal
investigation, but what should be
considered is the time frame.
The last time Maddie McCann was seen alive was at 17:30, that's the hour
she leaves the children's playground
area and returns home with her
mother, from then on she never
appears. Later the alert is given by
the mother upon returning to the
apartment, where she doesn't find
the child, roughly about 10:30 at
night, 22:30.
So, the time period in which the
crime occurs, what happened exactly
we don't know but whatever happened
took place between 17:30 and 22:30,
the events took place during this
time frame of five hours. At that
time the man was somewhere else,
actually far away from there. They
cannot justify, that just because
the man committed a crime of
burglary at noon and since they
don't have anyone else the guy of
the noon robbery will do, this is
wanting to place the suspect at the
crime scene, this is wanting to
forcefully place the blame.
I just don't understand this
investigation... What is certain is
that this is a horn of plenty, where
several millions have already been
spent, this latest 96.000 euros will
no doubt allow for another team of
brilliant investigators to be lodged
at a 5 star hotel because there's
money to pay for that, and when this
man is discarded...
The PJ investigation spoke of three
dead men, and all those were
investigated, so there are no more
dead men left to be accused as
suspects because those would be the
ideal suspects since they cannot
defend themselves. Now, this man
will surely give the same
explanations he gave in the process
(case files), that are already there
in fact. Curiously, up to today,
Scotland Yard was unable to identify
a single suspect that hadn't been
already identified by the PJ, they
look at the process and likely say,
we've already spoken with this one,
next one, and so on.
From the perspective of a criminal investigation this reveals an extreme
ineptitude, even intellectually. The
crime that man committed was at
noon, the other was at night time,
it doesn't matter, anything goes.
This is playing, more than with the
investigation, with people's
feelings.
Sara Carrilho - Professor
Rui Pereira, we are getting
closer to the 10th anniversary of
Madeleine McCann's disappearance,
and there is no credible lead. This
suspect committed a crime of
burglary during the morning but
nothing links him directly to the
disappearance.
|
|
|
|
Rui Pereira - Well, this is
completely out of step with reality.
If I believed in conspirational
theories I would say that this is
the reaction of the English
authorities to Gonçalo Amaral's
acquittal.
It's a curious way to approach this
situation but nothing else really
explains that a new lead was
followed now, when is in fact an old
lead, where the indicia are
incompatible with the practice of a
crime committed against the child.
In reality there is an assumption
that is vexatious for us, that is a
sort of insinuation, or
presumptuousness, that our police
authorities are incompetent, that
our criminal police bodies don't
know how to investigate this case
and so on.
Well, that is not in question, what
is in question in this case, and we
always have to return to the
beginning, is: parents that were not
sufficiently diligent with securing
their children, toddlers
practically, parents that left them
to their own fate, who could have
been eventually persecuted for the
crime of exposure and abandonment
(neglect) and weren't.
Then, in question is an
investigation that was extremely
difficult due to lack of leads, lack
of concrete evidence. Sadly not all
cases are solved, for them to be
solved it's necessary that one acts
with some rationality. A case should
be reopened if there is new indicia,
but indicia should be never be
fabricated by any means. Sadly, it
doesn't seem there is anything new
in this situation. Each time we
speak about this case, I always
express my wish the child would
appear alive, and if that is not
possible because the child is no
longer among us, then at least the
truth should be known, that is very
important.
|
|
Carlos Anjos - I am in complete
agreement. I too believe this is a
reaction to the aquittal since the
Supreme Court practically dismisses the
abduction thesis, so something had to be
created, a sort of game. Then the
incompetent authorities, they do think
like that, ironically, every suspect
identified so far was done by the
incompetent authorities, because so far
they weren't able to have the necessary
incompetence to identify a suspect, they
have to pick up from those who had
already been identified. Then, the issue
of British chauvinism is always present.
If we rewind the film, who was the main
suspect, the one that had the strongest
suspicions against him? It was Robert
Murat, unjustly, the ground had been
disturbed...
Sara Carrilho - He was
constituted as an arguido.
Carlos Anjos - ... He was
constituted as an arguido.
Rui Pereira - He had some
pornographic material on his computer.
Carlos Anjos - ... Exactly,
searches were done to his home. Did the
English authorities, in their
investigation, ever suspect Robert
Murat? No, because he is a fellow
countryman.
Rui Pereira - Precisely.
Carlos Anjos - In other words,
who are the suspects the English
authorities pursue? A drunk man, or a..
They've came after all the unfortunate
persons, Portuguese, that could not even
afford to defend themselves legally, and
we only didn't have more people
persecuted because those had nothing
whatsoever to do with the case.
Rui Pereira - Carlos that
expresses, and I'm not an expert of
criminal investigation, but that
expresses a systematic error by the
British authorities, which is, they pay
greater attention to the area, to those
who were in the area instead of the
close circle of family and friends. It
is there in my perspective....
Sara Carrilho - That's an issue
that was also pointed out by the
Supreme.
Carlos Anjos - But that is
exactly where they don't want to focus.
What the British authorities clearly
want is to exonerate the circle that was
close to the child, to protect them of
being accountable for what has happened
to Maddie, for the way they've treated
her, that is the crime of exposure and
abandonment of the children. That is why
they are trying to get an “abductor”, so
they can assign the blame to a poor
fellow, irrespectively if he is alive or
dead, regardless if they find the child
or not, whilst clearing all the others
from the circle. I firmly believe that
is an impossibility.
Sara Carrilho - But the fact is
that they have 96 thousand euros to
continue the investigation.
Broadcast by CMTV, Rua Segura Se.17
EP.52, March 15, 2017 |
|
|
|
|