The purpose of this site is for information and a record of Gerry McCann's Blog Archives. As most people will appreciate GM deleted all past blogs from the official website. Hopefully this Archive will be helpful to anyone who is interested in Justice for Madeleine Beth McCann. Many Thanks, Pamalam

Note: This site does not belong to the McCanns. It belongs to Pamalam. If you wish to contact the McCanns directly, please use the contact/email details campaign@findmadeleine.com    

Exclusive Footage of "Eddie" Cadaver Dog at HDLG.

HOMEPAGE NEWS REPORTS INDEX DOGS IMAGES NEWS MARCH 2012
INVESTIGATION IMAGES Jersey Haut de la Garenne sniffer dog footage posted online BBC-12-03-2012
Original Source: VOICE FOR CHILDREN: 10 MARCH 2012
Saturday, 10 March 2012
 
Lenny Harper

Once more VFC is able to bring our readers/viewers another, what we are told is, a world exclusive.

With the assistance of Former Senior Investigating Officer of the Jersey Child Abuse Investigation, and Former Deputy Chief Police Officer Mr. Lenny Harper, we are able to bring you exclusive video footage of arguably the world's most renowned Cadaver Dog "Eddie" not only working at the crime scene of the Former Jersey Children's Home, Haute de la Garenne, but alerting to the scent of human death.

Not a great deal of these Cadaver dogs work has been reported in the State Media, other than to discredit them, so we asked Mr. Harper to document for us just exactly what is happening in the video below, what does a Cadaver dog do? How significant to the investigation the dog was? What, if anything did he (the dog) find?The results, it has to be said were astounding. Mr. Harper agreed to our request and once again we thank him for his commitment to the truth and justice.

For viewers information "JAR/6" is the fragment of child's skull.

00.00.0 Getting ready. I was reluctant to let the dog inside as I did not feel that it would do much good. In truth, I was a little sceptical - I had not felt a favourable impression from the handler (Martin Grimes) at our initial meeting and I was dubious, although my opinion of his qualities and integrity was to markedly change as events unfolded. I began to realise as I worked closely with him over a period of months that what I originally took as arrogance was simply supreme confidence in the ability of his dogs in the face of jealous, empire protecting rivals who were not as professionally capable. Throughout the investigation, we subjected Martin and his dogs to many 'verifying' tests, from burying swabs in sand (which he always found no matter how large an area), to minute blood stains. The dogs never failed. Many of these tests were carried out in front of Jersey politicians and media, including Channel Television and Diane Simon of the JEP. Frank Walker and Andrew Lewis were only two of the politicians who witnessed the ability of the dogs in hugely impressive displays. Funny how they all forgot this when they jumped on the bandwagon which sought to ruin Martin Grime's reputation. One of the most spectacular exercises occurred when one of the Anthropologists brought a vial of sand back that she had removed from the tomb of a mummy in Egypt. We put this vial on a beach, below the sand, and let Eddie off to look for it. The dog amazingly sought it out in a few minutes and gave us the reaction you will see in this video. To get back to the start of the video and my initial doubts, after a few days outside I had at least gained a grudging respect for Martin's hard work and dedication. I still was not keen to extend the search inside the house with the dog; however, I reluctantly conceded that we should look at all our possibilities so that we could walk away and say that we had given it a good shot. You can see me standing looking less than confident.

00.00.45 The first indication that the dog (Eddie) is finding something amiss. His behaviour has changed, and is remarked on by the handler. He is initially reacting further down from where we were to eventually find the initial fragment, (which ILM and others still incorrectly claim to be definitively identified as coconut) and in the flow of the drainage from the area where it was found. To clarify, Eddie is trained to trace the scent of dead human flesh. He will react where this scent is found, not necessarily where it was originally located. His strongest reaction will normally be where that scent is strongest, which will usually be where the dead flesh has lain longest, but he will sense it in areas where the scent has been carried, for instance, by drains.

00.01.08 Eddie is starting to react strongly now. Although still some yards from the finding of JAR/6, he smells something which has been carried down in the drainage from the original source. We were later to find that the drain ran down from where we found JAR/6 and where the bones were found by the builders, who suspected that they were also the bones of juveniles. One of them identified a child's pelvic bone from the internet. These bones were found with children's' shoes which were to be later the source of interesting conflicts between the evidence of the pathologists and the staff at the Jersey Museum.

00.01.50 The doors and wall where Eddie is reacting so strongly now lead into the room where the top wall adjoins the stair area where JAR/6 (the infamous initial fragment) was found. Note the change in the dog's behaviour, and the strong indication from his that there is something to be investigated here. It is important to note at this point, that the dog is only telling us that the scent of human death is here. He is not telling us that there has been a murder; he is not telling us that this is the spot where a body has been buried. He is only telling us that the scent of human death is at this spot. He is saying, "There is something here for you to investigate." It is worthy of note, that this is also next to the location where builders found the bones which they thought were human juveniles, and where they were told that if they found bones to let "bygones be bygones."

00.02.25 Eddie is now at the doors leading to the stairwell where both JAR/6 and the "builders' bones" were found. Note that he is reacting strongly. To corroborate Eddie's reaction we used the most up to date geological equipment supplied to us by the British Army and the Metropolitan Police (more services obtained through the use of contacts and a hospitality budget!) for which we paid nothing. These surveys confirmed inconsistencies in the sub floor levels.

00.02.39 Eddie is telling us that there is something we need to investigate on the other side of the door and he wants through to indicate this to us.

00.02.58 Eddie is now reacting very strongly and indicating to us that the scent of dead human flesh is in this location. This is where we were to find JAR/6, which the establishment continue to say was only coconut, but cannot explain how Eddie reacted as he did, nor indeed, how the lab at Oxford found Collagen.

Collagen is not found in coconut or wood, it is only present in mammals, which would seem to destroy the claims of the Jersey establishment, aided and abetted by the Jersey Evening Post and Channel Television, that JAR/6 is coconut or wood. Again, it is worthy of recall, that the builders who found the bones at this location thought they were human, and that one of them actually identified a bone as that of a child's pelvic bone from the internet. Additionally, the police officer who was called to the scene was also dubious of the bones' origins, as was the female pathologist who attended. She "did not like" the situation and referred the matter to her boss who said the bones where not consistent with being human. However, an Anthropologist later stated that he was incorrect and the measurements he quoted were entirely consistent with the bones being children's' pelvic bones as identified by one of the builders. The Anthropologist further stated that the Pathologist was not qualified to make the statement that he had.

00.04.06 Now Eddie has just left the wall adjoining the stair area where he reacted earlier. The drains in the building run from those stairs, under the adjoining wall, and down the room where we are now standing. As the dog is trained to detect the scent of dead human flesh, he is now following the strong scent emanating from the other side of the wall and being carried in the drains under the floor of this room and down the room towards the corridor seen earlier in the video.

00.04.15 Note the dog's return to the wall. This was almost the exact spot where JAR/6 was found. It is a few inches from where the builders found the bones which they thought were human and which they were told about, "Let bygones be bygones." If this dog was a waste of money, then how did he lead us to this exact spot? How did he later, in the 'live' presence of Wendy Kinnard (the then Home Affairs Minister) and Graham Power (the then Chief Police Officer), lead us to the bones in the cellars which an Anthropologist in the United Kingdom said were "fleshed and fresh" when burnt and buried? It cannot be a co-incidence that this dog, trained to detect the scent of dead human flesh, reacted so strongly in an area where we were to find a fragment of substance initially identified by a professional, accomplished, Anthropologist, as a part of a child's skull, and right beside the spot where builders found bones and children's shoes which they thought were human bones. No amount of spin by Le Marquand and others can contradict this, and no amount of misinformation from Warcup and Gradwell can conceal this truth.

00.04.41
Eddie still on stairs, right above the location where JAR/6 was found. He comes down again to the exact spot.

00.05.20 Eddie still reacting strongly at the spot where JAR/6 was found.

This is the live video, filmed on a mobile phone as it happened. The film was made by the Homicide Search Advisor of the National Policing Improvement Agency, on his mobile phone. He was to later say that the way we had carried out the search of HDLG was a "shining example" and should be documented as an example of good practice. Where has this recommendation been lost in the mists? The reactions of the dog speak for themselves. Eddie is not telling us that murder was committed at HDLG. He is telling us that somewhere in the floor-space of the premises; the scent of human death has been present. He is telling us that there is something there for us to investigate. His findings have been corroborated by the finding of the bones and teeth, by the results of the surveys carried out by the most sophisticated of electronic geological equipment, and by the evidence of builders and former residents and victims of abuse in HDLG. This video totally contradicts the spin of Frank Walker, Andrew Lewis and Diane Simon of the Jersey Evening Post, all of whom were taken on a tour of the building and given a demonstration of the ability and capability of Eddie and his companion "Keela" the blood detection dog. All of them were aware of the true situation relating to the dog and the finds. All of them, for their own reasons, chose to ignore the truth and to peddle the myths of those seeking to discredit the victims of the horrific abuse within HDLG. They are now, in my opinion, exposed as craven cowards and not fit to lick those victims' boots. As for Martin Grimes and the dogs that they have tried to discredit, they are now working full time for one of the best Law Enforcement Agencies in the world in the USA.(END)


We will publish some of the documented evidence concerning the finds of human remains in the comment section of this post.

 

 

 

  

voiceforchildren said...

As mentioned in the main posting.

 

Some documented evidence.

 

JAR/30: 3-4; 1940s to 1980s. Two fragments of burnt bone one is fragment of longbone? Tibia. Submitted to University of Sheffield with KSH/158. Origin confirmed as human. Submitted for dating awaiting results.

 

JAR/33: 3-4; 1940s to 1980's.

Calcined fragment of bone. ?human.

 

JAR/53: 183. Cellar 3 Dark char rich deposit equivalent to 169.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

5 fragments of calcined long bone ?human.

 

JAR/54: 183. Cellar 3 Dark char rich deposit equivalent to 169.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

4 fragments of calcined bone ?human.

 

JAR/55: 183. Cellar 3 Dark char rich deposit equivalent to 169.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

1 fragment of calcined bone ?human.

 

JAR/57:183. Cellar 3 Dark char rich deposit equivalent to 169.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

2 fragments of bone of unknown origin.

 

JAR/56: 183. Cellar 3 Dark char rich deposit equivalent to 169.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

1 fragment of bone ?human.

 

JAR/67: 183. Zone 3 East Cellar 3.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Human Tooth: deciduous left maxillary first molar, age 9 yrs + 3 yrs. Could have been shed naturally (Anthro exam).

Submitted to odontologist, see report.

 

JAR/69: 183. Zone 3 East Cellar 3.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragments x 3 of possible human cortical bone.

 

JAR/61: 183 Zone 4 East Cellar 3.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

23 Fragments of bone:

1 Burnt fragment which closely resembles a human juvenile mastoid process.

2. Burnt fragment of ?human mandible.

3. Fragments of burnt long bone x 3 measuring between 11.3 and 16.3 mm.

4. Fragments of unidentified burnt cortical and trabecular bone x 7.

5. Fragment of slightly burnt long bone measuring 33 mm. The cortex of the

bone resembles human but it is quite thick and the trabeculae can not be seen because it requires cleaning. It appears to have been cut at one end.

6. Fragments of unburnt unidentified long bone. x 3 The appearance and texture of the cortex of the fragments appears more animal than human but it is advised that further examination should be undertaken in order to confirm this.

7. Fragments of unidentified long bone x 7. 5 have been burnt and 2 haven't. Species

uncertain although two of the burnt fragments could possibly be human

 

JAR/90: 183 Cellar 3 Zone 3 East.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragments of unidentified bone of unknown species. One which is calcined is possibly human bone.

 

Cellar 4 Context 169 (redeposited char material from fire elsewhere. Unsealed)

 

JAR/36: 169. Cellar 4 E. Charred material at southern end of Zone 4. Equivalent to 127.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragment of bone ?human.

 

JAR/37: 169. Cellar 4 E. Charred material at southern end of Zone 4. Equivalent to 127.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragment of burnt bone. ?human mastoid process

 

JAR/39: 169. Cellar 4 E. Charred material at southern end of Zone 4. Equivalent to 127.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragment of burnt bone ?human.

 

JAR/40: 169. Cellar 4 E. Charred material at southern end of Zone 4. Equivalent to 127.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Fragment of bone ?human.

 

GMK/18: 169. Cellar 4 E. Charred material at southern end of Zone 4. Equivalent to 127.

4 / 5: 1960s to present date.

Human tooth. Anthro exam - deciduous left maxillary lateral incisor. Age range
6 yrs + 2yrs

 10 March 2012 17:22

TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE CONSIDER

Site Policy Contact details Sitemap Website created by Pamalam