|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
This site does not belong to the McCanns it belongs to Pamalam,
if you wish to contact the McCanns direct, please do
not
use the contact/email details on the left, use
campaign@findmadeleine.com
Site
Policy
|
|
P.J.TRANSLATIONS INDEX |
|
TRANSLATION BY INES |
521 to 533 External
diligence re municipal
aerodrome of Portimao
2007.06.13
534 to 538 Analysis of CCTV
images from Albufeira marina |
|
08-02-Aircraft: Outro Apensos vol 2 Apenso VIII 521 to 538 |
OUTROS
APENSOS VIII, volume II,
Pages 521 to 533
External Inquiry
Place: Municipal
Aerodrome
Portimao
Date: 2007.06.13
Requested by: G. Amaral
Executing Officers: Inspectors Ramos and Dordonnat
Description and Result of Inquiry
On this date we went to the Municipal Aerodrome in Portimao with
the aim of collecting
information
related to the air traffic in that space between the days 25 ?
04- 2007 and 05-05-2007 as well as locating and collecting
flight plans between the dates 0321000MAI07 and 042100MAI 07.
Together with the operators and consulting the lists relating to
the period in question there is only one register of plane not
familiar to the employees, which has the registration number D ?
EDBS.
This plane landed in Portimao on 28 ? 04 ? 2007 at approximately
16.53 coming from LFBL (code corresponding to Limoges, in
France) and left on 06-05-2007 at about 09.47 headed for the
place of provenance.
Its is recorded that the pilot is A**** S***** and a passenger
who was not identified by the security office at the aerodrome.
Information was gathered showing that the individual in
question, although not a frequent visitor, would sometimes
travel to Portimao, in the company of his wife, as he has a
holiday home
in this area, it is not known exactly where.
It is stated that the Lagos aerodrome is functioning but given
that it is not certified there is no register of planes or
passengers, a similar situations in other of these installations
and it was established that the only registers kept are those at
the Portimao and Tires aerodromes.
With regard to radar location, in the case of not having
transponder links with the craft, this is not detected, however
in the case of
international flights
where the crossing of air space involves more than one country,
in principle this situation is not
checked,
as the planes are detected by radar and the location is
transmitted to the central coordinator located in Faro.
A list of users from 03 and 04 May 2007 is attached. The runway
is not authorised for use from 20.00 onwards and there is no
register of any abnormal situation, there is 24 hour vigilance
of air space.
Annexes: |
|
TRANSLATION BY ALBYM |
|
Outros Apensos vol 2 Apenso VIII pages 522-523. |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_521 |
|
MISSING
PAGE |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_522 |
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_523 |
 |
OK, I have interpreted the diligence of 13 June re: the air
traffic information. The following is my personal opinion.
On the face of it, and based solely on the reading of that one
report, it would appear that any holes one might have perceived
from the notes on the maritime work are magnified multiple times
over when it comes to air traffic - BUT - there are three points
of context that one must bear in mind:
1 - this diligence was only in respect of civilian,
non-international-carrier traffic.
2 - all flights over Europe have to register a flight plan and
have to fly with identification instruments active.
3 - non-civilian monitoring of the European airspace far exceeds
anything done by civilians.
In 1 and 3 above, we have no information in the DVD documents
about work done with international carriers and non-civilian
agencies. This applies to all types of flight: passenger,
freight and other.
In 2 above, this diligence (and here I am reading between the
lines) appeared to be a meeting of representatives from the
larger civilian operators along the south coast of Portugal in
an attempt to confirm what, if any, additional information they
might have had for non-international-carrier flights to and from
their airstrips.
Essentially, any aerodrome, e.g. Lagos - which is named in the
report - that is not 'certified' as being a part of the
international network of airports (e.g. viz:
http://www.airportfact.com/c5762-PT--portugal.html
) is not legally required to maintain any supplementary records
or logs of either aircraft or passenger manifests.
In this meeting only Portimao and Tires were found to have
maintained any supplementary records. It was also noted that no
flights were permitted from the Portimao runway after 20H00 and
no extraneous flights were detected on 3 and 4 May.
A final comment re: point 2 above, not only are there various
legal penalties for failing to use instruments correctly,
including fines, impounding of craft and freight, loss of
licence, etc., any craft failing to file, or deviating from a
filed flightplan, and found to be attempting to fly 'invisibly'
in European airspace, runs the risk of being 'met' by a
non-civilian agency. An unsatisfactory response to such a
meeting could, in a worst-case scenario, result in a newspaper
report about there having been an accident due to 'pilot error'.
Page 524 is
a list of flights that do not need translating.
Pages 525-526 missing
Page 527
you may find this report interesting:
http://www.peter2000.co.uk/aviation/granada/index.html
======================
As for the flight plan page, not everything fits the AFPEx
guide-screens exactly, nor CAP694, but that is probably because
it is a post-filing acknowledgement report as opposed to an
actual on-line filing.
FF LPFRZPZX
(Priority=FF=standard; Address=Faro)
281450 LFPYZMFP
(file-day-time=DDHHMM; originator=Bretigny-sur-Onge)
-TITLE ACK -MSGTYP IFPL -FILTIM 281449 -ORIGINDT 0704281450
(Acknowledgement of flight plan; filed on day-time: DDHHMM;
origin date-time: YYMMDDHHMM)
-BEGIN ADDR
-FAC LPFRZPZX (Faro)
-END ADDR
-EXTADDR -NUM 001
(I think this means there is only one plan)
-IFPLID BB73451562
(flightplan ID)
-MSGTXT (FPL-FHJCM-ZG
(MessageText: type=flightplan - planeid=FHJCM - flight type=G
(general)
-BE9L/L-SY/S
(plane type=BE9L/wake turbulence=L (light)
(-COM/NAV/APP equipt=SY i.e. Std VHF RTF,ADF,VOR,ILS+mandatory
radio w/8.33kHz spacing
(/SSR=S Transponder ModeS+pressure altitude)
-LPPM1700
(departfrom=LPPM (Portimao);time=1700)
-N0220VFR SOTEX/N0220F160 IFR W7 FTM DCT
(cruise speed=0220knots;cruise level=VFR; Over SOTEX waypoint:
cruise speed=0220knots;altitude=F160;
(route: change to IFR [mandatory in EU airspace]; ATS route W7
FTM;
-LPCO0100 LPPR
(Destination=LPCO (Coimbra); EET=0100 (expected flight time one
hour); Alternate=LPPR (Porto))
-EET/SOTEX0015 OPR/PVT DOF/070428 ORGN/LPFRZPZX
(expected to cross SOTEX waypoint after 15 minutes;
Operator/Private; Date of flight/2007-04-28; Origin/Faro)
NOTES:
The plan was addressed to Faro by an operator in France about a
flight due to leave Portimao 2 hours later on 28 April.
Faro acknowledged the plan in which the plane would fly to a
waypoint called SOTEX, follow a pre-defined route known as W7
over a waypoint called MAGUM, then on to a waypoint called FTM
after which it will exit the flight channel to land in Coimbra.
According to this document (
http://www.ivaopt.org/realops/traffic
) the SOTEX/FTM is a southbound flight channel; I would have
thought that he should have gone up via Troia/MTL.
ATS routes:
http://www.nav.pt/ais/aips/LP_Sup_A_2006_001_en_P1.pdf
The only waypoint on W7 is MAGUM
http://www.fallingrain.com/waypoint/PO/MAGUM.html
Some airport data
http://www.fallingrain.com/icao/LPCO.html
http://www.fallingrain.com/icao/LPPM.html
How it got from Coimbra to Braga would be the subject of one or
more other flight plans not on the DVD, and irrelevant to the
case. We only know about this plane because it flew to Portimao
on 3 or 4 May - and that is really the only 'fact' that we know
about it. The above plan was filed but that doesn't mean that
the flight actually happened.
Pages 528 to 533 are additional flight schedules that do not
need translation
Pages 534, 535
Closing off the volume are pages which talk about
video material from the port of Albufeira being on two
video disks.
Pages 536 and 537 missing)
Pages 538
Closing off the volume are which talk about video material
from the port of Albufeira being on two video disks. |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_524 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_525 |
|
MISSING PAGE |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_526 |
|
MISSING PAGE |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_527 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_528 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_529 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_530 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_531 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_532 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_533 |
|
 |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_534 |
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_535 |
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_536 |
|
 |
 |
MISSING
PAGE |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_537 |
|
MISSING PAGE |
|
02_volume_II_o_apenso_VIII_538 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARITIME POLICE |
|
BOATS THE VISION |
|
PJ
PHOTOS |
|
PAGE ORDER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
